Ortega
Ortega
59 / 13
27th May 2013
28th May 2013
Scaner, compatible with my printer. Image 64 x64 16 color. Demo image scan time ~1,5h.
scanner printer input computer bpdarnold electronics pixelart

Comments

  • Schneumer
    Schneumer
    28th May 2013
    Too bad the scanneed image isn't colored, but that's the printer's job.
  • Schneumer
    Schneumer
    28th May 2013
    I said it was slow, but i didn't downvote, now why would I, it's AMAZING!
  • xetalim
    xetalim
    28th May 2013
    TPT has reached a new era! HIGH TECH era!+1 and fav and fuck all the n00bs complaining about the speed
  • leechi
    leechi
    28th May 2013
    *scanner
  • Dragono313
    Dragono313
    28th May 2013
    Outstanding electronics! Isn't that slow either: with the fpscap on 1000 fps it scans the image in just under 15 minutes (I get 250fps)
  • MONIFEST
    MONIFEST
    28th May 2013
    Krasavec. 4ustvuyu mnogo vremeni ubil )
  • XxoriginxX
    XxoriginxX
    28th May 2013
    The only way I can think you can make it better is if you were to increase the number of bits to support a 32-bit color scheme... but that would go off the top of the screen. Maybe make it take a vertical image and create the scan along the horizontal axis, where you have more leeway?
  • Sillybudz
    Sillybudz
    28th May 2013
    Wait, two saves on FP by the same user? O_o
  • Box-Poorsoft
    Box-Poorsoft
    28th May 2013
    @Amphealy Too many noobs complaining about the slowness around here, when like me, they can't do crap. +1
  • Amphealy
    Amphealy
    28th May 2013
    outstanding +1. LOL at the noobs who -1 because it's slow. There's only so fast you can make TPT creactions run due to the frame rate and SPRK rate. I suggest you try make something along these lines to discover the limitations. Also, might be worth adding a tag suggesting that people use tpt.setfpscap(1000). Might get less whines aouut it being slow.