konsole
konsole
50 / 4
18th Jun 2014
18th Jun 2014
This randomiser is an improvement on my original Solid State Randomiser. It uses CLNE(SPRK) as a source of random power to replicate a classic MERC randomiser, with good results. It has no moving parts whatsoever.
randomizer compact clever bellcurve innovative gaussian

Comments

  • konsole
    konsole
    20th Jun 2014
    @SandwichLizard, sure. I would love to see it.
  • Sheik530
    Sheik530
    20th Jun 2014
    This is phenomenal. How is my stuff getting on the front page when there's more stuff like this out here?
  • slasher98
    slasher98
    20th Jun 2014
    Konsole, due to your creation I have made a more evenly distributed, non-solid state randomizer. ID=1566012. If anyone is interested, check it out. As for Konsole's save, I love it. Anything that can be moved by pistons and can do this is pretty awesome.
  • slasher98
    slasher98
    19th Jun 2014
    @Sandwichlizard: Please. I am not Op, but I wish to see this.
  • Sandwichlizard
    Sandwichlizard
    19th Jun 2014
    I have succeeded in making a reliable solid state randomizer with even distribution and no missed, multiplied, or parallel pulses. I did use aray/filt but there are no moving parts. may I post an id here?
  • JamesB
    JamesB
    19th Jun 2014
    Well done for improving on my design, you have eliminated the need for a switchboard to clean up the outputs. +1
  • konsole
    konsole
    19th Jun 2014
    Thanks for all the feedback, I will build a randomiser with an even distrobution over the weekend, and investigate the two outputs at the same time and occasional lack of output.
  • Anik456
    Anik456
    19th Jun 2014
    Its great however sometimes there are two outputs at exactly the same time
  • Sandwichlizard
    Sandwichlizard
    19th Jun 2014
    I have done further testing. it also multiplies spark and sends them in parallel also slightly biased to the right hand output. hard to say exactly because of the parallel pulse issue. I made a version that never misses and never parallel pulses but it is biased to the right 40/60. that is the same bias I ran into while trying to make an electron randomizer. I was never able to compensate without messing up reliability. This is however, still an important innovation.
  • tomatopipps
    tomatopipps
    19th Jun 2014
    nevermind