Sandwichlizard
Sandwichlizard
50 / 4
29th Dec 2015
2nd Jan 2016
here is the comparison of some gas randomizers. change the gas and see the different results. given: CO2, OXGN, HYGN, GAS. stop the test before sparking the reset button. if you let it run the charts will reset when full automatically.
electronic randomizer gaseuous test

Comments

  • Doughnut
    Doughnut
    2nd Jan 2016
    The machine kind of favors co2s sinking abillity and the oxygen and hydrogen move alot fast than the co2 and gas
  • Sandwichlizard
    Sandwichlizard
    1st Jan 2016
    @12Me21. CRAY(SPRK) Is not the solution for this project. It will require wiring to align the cray in the right place. There just isn't the room for it. Wifi is the best option for this machine right now.
  • 12Me21
    12Me21
    1st Jan 2016
    You could easily make the charts not use wifi, though the pstn mover would be harder. Maybe CRAY(SPRK)?
  • 12Me21
    12Me21
    1st Jan 2016
    Oh, and BIZG, CAUS, VRSG, FOG, PLSM, SMKE, MORT, AMTR, CFLM, WARP, and FIRE
  • 12Me21
    12Me21
    1st Jan 2016
    CO2 is bad because it is too heavy. GAS is too slow. OXYG and HYGN are good. You should try BOYL, NBLE, and WTRV.
  • Sandwichlizard
    Sandwichlizard
    1st Jan 2016
    @Daeox. I am sure TPT takes atvantage of some code similar to x=INT(RND y) where y is the range to generate a random number. It is Psudorandom because it is a computer after all. however you and I will never be able to tell the difference. it is beyond human comprehension.
  • Sandwichlizard
    Sandwichlizard
    1st Jan 2016
    @tomlom. the accessories are there because I needed them for other test setups. this test does not require them. I used the indexer and the AND gate to test my NOT gate. It all depends on what you need to test.
  • tomlom
    tomlom
    1st Jan 2016
    where do you put the accesories
  • program
    program
    1st Jan 2016
    So it seems OXGN is best. CO2 tends to be biased on one output.
  • Daeox
    Daeox
    1st Jan 2016
    Though of course none of this is random. I believe if you looke at the diffusion values and calculated for gravity, pressure...it would be difficult, but you could probably calculate where the particle would move during each frame.