*** ATTENTION *** A bug has been fixed in R16K1S60. The instruction TEST would behave like the instruction AND and would store the result in the primary operand. Not anymore. *** Please update your R16K1S60 copies. ***
even when i go down to 20fps, this thing is still insanely fast!
Thanks! Please note that 4,533,709,441 is not actually an element of the Fibonacci sequence though. As the text in the save says, element = A * 65536 + B. I don't have a 32-bit display so I used to 16-bit ones. That means the number you're referring to is actually 2,971,215,073 which, by the way, *is* in the 32-bit number range unlike 4,533,709,441.
Any computer built in a two dimensional cellular automator that can run the fibonacci sequence up to 4,533,709,441 is genius in my book. i wish i could +1 more than once because i'm still absolutely blown away by this. congratulations.
lol, my laptop is so crappy that R16K1S60 is actually 20Hz on it...
Nope. Not at all what I mean.
and you would also have to make the display be 120Hz
Sure. It's a bit messy though. Although Schmolendevice is the one to ask when it comes to multicore computing, I can tell you that it's pointless to have multiple cores when what you're doing cannot actually be done on multiple cores (ie. the task is not parallelizable). Adding up 6, 2 and 8 is not really parallelizable, since you need the result of the first addition to get started with the second. Adding up 6, 2, 8 and 7, on the other hand, can still be done in two additions' worth of time.
would it be possible to make a dual-core 120Hz processor?