The Powder Toy

Light tank BT-9 by Beatless123

Beatless123
Beatless123
46 / 3
18th Aug 2020
18th Aug 2020
Alternative history! Russians needed to replace BT-7 and T-26 but T-70 project failed. They decided to make stronger BT-9 instead. It has 60 mm front armor, 30 mm side armor, 20 mm rear and top armor. I give credit to HarunK for original BT-7.
tank bonkgun

Comments

  • seemeasyouare
    seemeasyouare     23rd Aug 2020
    These comments are nothing but paragraphs of "KAhOoT"
  • Deine_Mutter
    Deine_Mutter     23rd Aug 2020
    XD, is funny. Comedy 100
  • seemeasyouare
    seemeasyouare     23rd Aug 2020
    You know the walls and floor
  • seemeasyouare
    seemeasyouare     23rd Aug 2020
    Could I use everything else but that tank in a mushroom cloud save?
  • AlehandroBlyat
    AlehandroBlyat     20th Aug 2020
    Hey, man. You're wrong if you say that all Russian MBTs "basically use T-54 chassis". Firstly, T-54 had 5-wheeled chassis while all MBTs since (and including) T-64 had 6-wheeled (and much more constructional differences which i don't want to describe). Moreover, even T-64, T-72/90 and T-80 have different construction of chassis.
  • Beatless123
    Beatless123     20th Aug 2020
    Obviously. The tank is not made to resist PROT.
  • Vodkiller762
    Vodkiller762     20th Aug 2020
    the cow cannon was capable of penetrating and destroying it in one shot
  • CTpyromaniac1337
    CTpyromaniac1337     20th Aug 2020
    the BT-SV wasn't a new chassis, the only difference is the amount of armor added onto the hull
  • Mindustryfan
    Mindustryfan     19th Aug 2020
    small dose of elec on the cannoon = dead
  • Beatless123
    Beatless123     18th Aug 2020
    BT-SV looks nice but it is too different from BT-7. Making a new chassis is more expensive than modifying the existing one. All Russian MBTs except T-14 Armata basically use T-54 chassis, they just have some ERA and composite armor, increasing their effective thickness.