post bugs here by jacob1

jacob1

188 / 28

29th Sep 2012

16th Mar 2014

Post any bugs you find here. But there aren't as many bugs that are really bugs and I don't already know about than when this first started, so also use this as a general conversation save, or to ask / tell me anything. #1 most commented save in tpt!

problems jacob1 bugreport glitch fix 960847 tptpp bugs tptplusplus glitches

Comments

• 

  jacob1 29th May 2022
  Ok so I guess DEUT is actually pretty close to water, and not very toxic. Altough it's often mixed with other toxic things so you still shouldn't drink it :P. I just guessed on how it worked IRL based on how it works in TPT, bad idea to trust TPT logic. So we have 5 types of water.
• 

  jacob1 29th May 2022
  (and don't try to count heavy water, lol)
• 

  jacob1 29th May 2022
  We have 4 types of water (water, salt water, carbonated water, and freeze water)
• 

  jacob1 29th May 2022
  heptium345: the particle limit includes the parts of the screen where you can't draw. But if you pause the game you can draw there, so it actually is exactly the simulation area. heptium345: good point I also forget carbonated water exists.
• 

  heptium345 29th May 2022
  NeonSkye: i think tungsten and carbonated water go un-noticed by me.
• 

  heptium345 29th May 2022
  BOBHAMSTER: why, the particle limmit is bigger that the amount of particles to fit the screen, also in one of my saves it uses the particle limmit and then my particle limmiter would also be useless
• 

  jacob1 28th May 2022
  NeonSkye: ISOZ/ISZS are pretty forgettable. And I dislike VINE. There may be others I'm forgetting :).BOBHAMSTER: particle limit won't be removed, it would only serve to add more lag in extreme stacking situations. Plus NeonSkye is right about there being technical limitations, which in fact come far before the integer limit. (In fact, increasing the window size by a certain doable amount would be enough to cross this limit).
• 

  BOBHAMSTER 28th May 2022
  NeonSkye: but it would be fun!
• 

  NeonSkye 28th May 2022
  BOBHAMSTER: why remove those limits? It will only take more resources to simulate more particles. Not only that, but I'm sure if the arbitrary limit were to be removed, someone will run into the bit integer limit. Even then, you can bypass the current limit with layering parts, and I don't think jacob is powerful enough to remove hardware limitations everywhere.
• 

  BOBHAMSTER 27th May 2022
  jacob1: maybe you should remove the particle limit as well as the fighter limit and veloctity limit