Neural Net: A New Kind of Processor (HELP)

  • BudCharles
    23rd Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    ??????
  • tothemyers
    23rd Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    Yes? What is all the ??????? about?
  • BudCharles
    23rd Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    I'm confused.
  • tothemyers
    23rd Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    About what? Please explain.
  • BudCharles
    23rd Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    Who cares, back on topic.
  • The-Con
    23rd Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @tothemyers (View Post)
    neurons, being random, should have unique properties on their inside, as that would increase randomisation. If everything is the same, all results will be similar.
  • tothemyers
    23rd Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    Exactly. The problem is, there is no way to detect neutrons without using a detector wall, which would take out the small aspect of it, as well as lowering the probability of an output. Even worse, it is possible to predict the output of photons from PCLN, because it is constant. Using CLNE on photons is unpredictable, but the only way to control it is with E-wall, which, again, takes out the small aspect of the neuron.

    In short, I have no idea what to do. It would be feasible to make a neuron if, like INVS transforms photons to neurons, glass turned neutrons into photons. But, since this does not happen, I appear to be royally screwed.

    Photons from PCLN: Predictable = BAD
    Neutrons from PCTN: Unpredictable = GOOD
  • Klotzstein
    23rd Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @UBERNESS (View Post)

    NSCN is too Close to PSCN wich makes the PCLN gives not enough time to spawn Neutrons


    I Think either 1) You should make holes or
    2) Connect the Metal to the other one so it would send sparks to other PCLN connected one and releasing Photons/Neutrons
  • The-Con
    23rd Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @tothemyers (View Post)
    What I'm saying, is to randomise the internal environment. e.g. puting random bits of METL inside, so that is will reflect within a single neuron.
    If you put glass over the PSCN it will detect it as if it were a photon (because it is turned into one)
    Basically it is as simple as coating the outside of the inside with glass, but leaving room for the neutrons to exit the PCLN.
  • tothemyers
    23rd Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink

    The-Con:

    @tothemyers!102927
    What I'm saying, is to randomise the internal environment. e.g. puting random bits of METL inside, so that is will reflect within a single neuron.
    If you put glass over the PSCN it will detect it as if it were a photon (because it is turned into one)
    Basically it is as simple as coating the outside of the inside with glass, but leaving room for the neutrons to exit the PCLN.


    1. I neutrons and photons vary speed, but coming from PCLN, they skip both. I am happy with the dispersion of neutrons.
    2. The only remaining problem: Neutrons are ideal to use, and cannot be detected by detector wall due to space constraints, leaving nothing else. I have personally tested it, the wiki lies, neutrons cannot be detected by placing glass in front of a standard PSCN NSCN photon detector.

    Get my point?
Locked by Lockheedmartin: Necro