How clever of you, naming a plasma bomb a nuke and all.. See, my little 12 year old internet-toddler friend, nuke dosent mean "big bomb", nuke is a retarded abbreviation of "nuclear" wich means exploiting the process of fission/fusion of an atom. Not putting lots of stuff that goes boom into a canister and lighting it on fire. The definition of bomb is a device that causes an explosion, usually through pressure differences, so your little "nuke" would fit better with the name "bomb".
On a closer study, i would call it an emmiter, since no actual explosion happens.
Almighty. no need for hostility's. I'll change the name. And you don't need to be so punctual. But other than the name thing, what do you think of the creation it's self? Oh and, I'm 18 haha.
In my opinion, a nuke uses solid/liquid elements (i.e. plutonium, uranium, isozium S and L, but not photons, neutrons, antimatter or singularity) from the Nuclear category, and a bomb doesn't.