*cough* *cough* The scarf isn't cool, bro. Tell knuckles to stop taking testosterone...
I think this is a cool save.
This always happens. We might as well call TPT "Science Youtube", and this is the comment section :/
I will side with sentinel-5. Photons don't have a full atomic mass... They have subatomic mass which completely obliterate the opposition's theories and theorums.. They may not carry mass like an atom but being able to accelerate and be influenced by gravity is also proofs of photon's massness
Oh man! NERD FIGHT!!! LOLOLOLOLZZZ!!!
Well, i should not have reacted that way, but still you're manipuling notions that you can't even grasp a tiny bit. "E" from Einstein formula is not mere "energy". You have to put it in a peculiar context. Moreover, you are going between "classical physics" and relativist physics in your use of the word "energy", so i can tell, you don't even know what you're talking about. Btw E=mc2 essentially tells about the energy of a particule "at rest"
look, th point of THEORISATION is that theories are THEORIES. they are not definitively true, no matter how widely believed. they can never be proven or disproven. everything is up fr debate if you have evidence to back your claims. if you have an idea, tell someone, it might be a good one. some things sound crazy. so crazy that they are probably total bullshine, like string theory. however, it's a beautiful theorum. so leave it be. it's just as likely to be true as every other theory.
@kamil2001studio Dude...Just...What the... Please... (Clue: I'm a graduate student. Wait, no, i just went to primary school ;) )
Well you can think so. Doesn't make it true. I do not claim that what is my opinion is absolutely true, for neither I have the knowledge of all humanity nor does any man know how does the universe work. Still, energy is not mass. Mass is energy, but it's only one of its forms.