TheNik
22nd Jan 2017
22nd Jan 2017
The VRSG fuel lasts as long as COAL, but burns > 59% hotter, meaning it generates that much more energy, and thus making it that much more efficient than COAL. The only major drawback is that handling VRSG is extremely difficult and dangerous. Enjoy!
fire
efficient
science
fuel
efficiency
comparison
virus
coal
burn
compare
Comments
-
an excellent way to turn everything into fire
-
This is very cheap but unstable fuel! You put some vrsg in tank and you just have to add some trash sometimes.
-
ikr it lasts s00000 long
-
Itdoesn't last as long though.
-
I totally agree, it is nearly impossible to contain VRSG fuel. It would be a nice challenge to create an indestructible-material-free tank for it. I may give it a try one day.
-
@nick445882 but, you can make walls with soap in the midd- wait that would destroy the VRSG, NERVERMIND
-
But in larger amounts the VRSG isnt that godd anymore compared to COAL.
-
Yeah...
-
LetsGoToSpace, this can be error due to randomness, and even if it is not, this difference is fairly insignificant.
-
Actally for me the coal lasted like under a second longer.