The Powder Toy

Antimatter behavior by Unturned

Unturned
Unturned
43 / 10
19th Jun 2017
19th Jun 2017
look insdie
nope inaccurate 100percenttrue wellmaybe kickbucketplox story true goawayplease notatag bees

Comments

  • Thoritho
    Thoritho     20th Jun 2017
    @coryman You are right. Antimatter is matter but with the charge of the particles inverted. Instead of a negative electron it is made of positive positrons, and negative protons. When it "touches" matter, they anihilate each other and create a large amount of energy, based on the mass of the products. And the dark matter is somethig totally different, teorized to explain the rotation of the galaxies.
  • coryman
    coryman     20th Jun 2017
    @Reyhan No offense, but source? I've heard it does release energy is all, I'd like to learn more. @MrBurgerMans I believe dark matter is more a concept that explains a phenomenon with gravity not acting as it should on a large scale, and if it does exist, it's undetectable
  • MrBurgerMans
    MrBurgerMans     20th Jun 2017
    coryman, i THINK your talking about dark matter, which i BELEIVE is like you described, and antimatter is the exact opisite of matter.
  • Reyhan
    Reyhan     20th Jun 2017
    Though the antimatter is negitive energy in relation to the positive, canceling them out
  • coryman
    coryman     19th Jun 2017
    TL;DR: matter can turn to energy based on mass, antimatter has positive mass, therefore the energy doesn't cancel
  • coryman
    coryman     19th Jun 2017
    @Azhaan I could be wrong, but as stated by Einstein, E=mc^2, meaning there's a direct link between mass and energy. Since antimatter has positive mass, it becomes positive energy, therefore both the matter and antimatter are turned into energy, often released in the form of light
  • Walle
    Walle     19th Jun 2017
    Inaccuracy*
  • Azhaan
    Azhaan     19th Jun 2017
    For the inacuacy I say -1, sorry :P
  • Azhaan
    Azhaan     19th Jun 2017
    Adding* xD
  • Azhaan
    Azhaan     19th Jun 2017
    No, antimatter acts like positives and negitives, no energy is realesed in the contact between the two, via explosion because the cancel each other out, like addinf 1 and -1, you get Zero, PT has an almost accuate representation, thogh the only thing inacurate is that it should destroy the same amount of particles that it was.