Unturned
Unturned
43 / 10
19th Jun 2017
19th Jun 2017
look insdie
nope inaccurate 100percenttrue wellmaybe kickbucketplox story true goawayplease notatag bees

Comments

  • Positron6
    Positron6
    19th Jun 2017
    I`m agree,but in result of reaction PHOT must stay (and there must be realy more PHOTs)
  • ExplosivePowderGuy
    ExplosivePowderGuy
    19th Jun 2017
    antimatter just destroys itself and a common matter atom on collision with common matter. That's why antimatter does the same thing that common matter does to antimatter, they both should get equally destroyed
  • zxaaw
    zxaaw
    19th Jun 2017
    Antimatter should react much more energetically, but not like a nuke - instant vaporisation of basically everything nearby.
  • JanKaszanka
    JanKaszanka
    19th Jun 2017
    Shouldnt be on fp.
  • tptquantum
    tptquantum
    19th Jun 2017
    Use SING for this. -1
  • PortalPlayer
    PortalPlayer
    19th Jun 2017
    G-LinuxorU: Ah, that's interesting. Certainly explains its behaviour. Wonder why they changed it.
  • G-LinuxorU
    G-LinuxorU
    19th Jun 2017
    i believe antimatter was originally going to be called nano, for nanobots. AKA Grey-goo, which explains their color.