hansungje
hansungje
4 / 5
6th Jan 2018
27th Jan 2018
No Description provided.

Comments

  • Mr_Cipher
    Mr_Cipher
    24th Jan 2018
    Rational Irrational What's the difference! One can be written as a fraction and the other cannot!
  • LBPHacker
    LBPHacker
    24th Jan 2018
    Not true, lol. Please learn to use rationals numbers.
  • hansungje
    hansungje
    23rd Jan 2018
    And there by cannot used by ACCURATE time unit.
  • hansungje
    hansungje
    23rd Jan 2018
    But let's think about this situation. There is a stopwatch working. It counts up by 0.1 second. But if 0.1 second is not integer*plank time, then the interval of 0.0 second~0.1 second would be not same with 0.1~0.2 second.
  • LBPHacker
    LBPHacker
    23rd Jan 2018
    And there's a logical fallacy here anyway. The fact that the tenth of a second may not be an integer multiple of a plank doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Just saying.
  • coryman
    coryman
    23rd Jan 2018
    Well, let's look at this mathematically. If you take a random number, there's a 1/10 chance that it's divisible by 10. So odds are, no, 1/10 of a second isn't an integer value. That said, I doubt our definition of a second is accurate to enough significant figures that we know exactly how many planck lengths it is. It would be like asking if a mile is divisible by the width of an electron
  • NoVIcE
    NoVIcE
    17th Jan 2018
    Oh i understand... Okay. Well you said it - integer, that means whole number. So no.
  • magnetman33
    magnetman33
    14th Jan 2018
    And high speed cameras that do 300k fps or more
  • magnetman33
    magnetman33
    6th Jan 2018
    Seeing as most stopwatches do 1/100th (0.01) second, and there are far more precise timekeeping devices, yes?
  • NoVIcE
    NoVIcE
    6th Jan 2018
    Why not?