maythe15
maythe15
1 / 1
24th Jan 2019
1st Feb 2019
No Description provided.

Comments

  • LBPHacker
    LBPHacker
    1st Feb 2019
    At the risk of sounding egocentric, I have made such a save in the past (id:2090957). In case you all do mean that one, my response to this is that my goal was not to make gold look bad but to demystify it (as the title of the save says), and the save itself was neutral as to whether gold is superior or inferior. If, on the other hand, you meant someone else's save, feel free to ignore this comment. I just thought it might help to clear up a misunderstanding.
  • maythe15
    maythe15
    26th Jan 2019
    Plasmey_401k: yeah but thats cheating
  • magnetman33
    magnetman33
    25th Jan 2019
    Whoever did that first test was trying to (but failing at) making gold look bad when it's main feature is literally a fast conductor(1.5x faster to be exact)
  • Plasmey_401k
    Plasmey_401k
    24th Jan 2019
    Keep in mind that inst is, in fact, instant.
  • Bossatronn
    Bossatronn
    24th Jan 2019
    even in the first test gold is still faster by a few frames