Saves quality research by z4dg9ssw135

z4dg9ssw135

21 / 3

9th Aug 2023

17th Aug 2023

A simple research done on last 10 pages of new saves (counted them ~07/08/2023 (August 7th)).

science

Comments

• 

  z4dg9ssw135 17th Aug 2023
  @TimeSan, this actually was supposed to be saves and their categories instead of quality but it was too much categories
• 

  Kezwick 17th Aug 2023
  I think that instead of just counting bad saves, you could tell how to make them better... If this has already been said, then I apologize in advance, I'm just inattentive.
• 

  peacefrog 17th Aug 2023
  This is a really interesting, high effort save that could possibly be a little biased due to its nature, but I feel like having art in the middle of the save quality list is a bit strange. Art saves still can be good or bad (e.g. my BP shitpost being bad) and if you want to have art then you should have it in another save about the different types of save that appear.
• 

  CheekyRand0m 17th Aug 2023
  trash (cts)
• 

  Meliac_Science 16th Aug 2023
  just saying mabye take it into consideration. since you decide to act like this.
• 

  Meliac_Science 16th Aug 2023
  its not an opinion and im not arguing anymore.
• 

  CheekyRand0m 15th Aug 2023
  trash (cts)
• 

  z4dg9ssw135 15th Aug 2023
  ...anyways now im thinking of getting few people to rate saves too so we will see how not only i will react to these saves
• 

  z4dg9ssw135 15th Aug 2023
  @ApertureScience1,(first messages) i will keep considering others' peoples saves low effort as it looks low effort, and also is low effort when you make couple a large brush moves at all screen. (speaking of "types of saves taking some sort of room") this is not "one save", this is roughly 20%. ("if you dont like quick and easy saves") Quick and easy and low effort differs from quick and easy and high effort.
• 

  z4dg9ssw135 15th Aug 2023
  @R4WLYX, i thought of making "examples" of low and high quality saves and it probably will be done in next time i look at saves