TPT Win64 build (91.5)
-
Hello everyone! I couldn't find any 64-bit Windows binaries for version 91.5, so I made one myself.
[EDIT]I added the rest of the SSE builds[/EDIT]
Info:
Win64-x86_64
Version 91.5.330
SSE,SSE2,SSE3
Lua console
GravFFT
Only 1 additional file (gcc dll, because it didn't get statically included)
[EDIT] No OpenGL, because it doesn't work
Virustotal results:
Downloads here (You NEED the libgcc_s_seh-1.dll to run these builds)
--Checking FPS increase compared to official WIN32 build--
When the game is opened, open the console and tpt.setfpscap(1000), then browse for a save named "R16K1S60" with the save id:[1932845] (It's a computer by LBPHacker, but it's good for constant fps test), unpause, but don't do anything. Check the fps.
My fps for each build:
Win32 (the one downloadable from the main site): 59.5-60.5
Win64-SSE: 74-75
Win64-SSE2: 75-77
Win64-SSE3: 74-75
For some reason, SSE2 performed better for me than SSE3. That might not be the case for you.
Edited 4 times by BobGamer455. Last: 31st Dec 2016 -
Maybe it's about time I do a 64 bit Windows build instead of 32 bit. The reasons we don't have one now is that, 64 bit isn't actually too much faster. I haven't done any benchmarks though. Your results kind of surprise me, maybe I need to do more testing. Some things might also work differently on the 64 bit build, but the only difference I know about right now is in the Lua API.
I'd also like to point out that your legacy and SSE 64 bit builds are pointless, because x86_64 CPUs always have at least SSE2. I stopped providing "legacy" builds because probably every computer made in the last 10 years supports SSE2. I also find it a little unlikely that there is much difference between Legacy and SSE2/SSE3.
Last thing, compiling TPT with Visual Studio is going to be 10-20% faster than compiling TPT from Linux with a cross compiler. I increased the speed of the snapshots that way. I wouldn't be surprised if these builds are actually slower than the snapshots. The current official Windows version was cross compiled from Linux though, which is why it is so slow. -
Oh, alright then, I'll remove the Legacy, and i'll test a win64 build made with VS. By the way, IDK why, but some antivirus software think that the snapshots are viruses
-
@BobGamer455 (View Post)
Yes, i'm not sure why either ... it happened when I started compiling them with visual studio.
BTW when I tested it your version was a lot faster than the snapshots. I don't remember an exact % but it was more than 20% faster (and that's on top of the 10-20% boost from the official version to the snapshots). So if I compile it right, the next version of TPT should be really fast :) -
Wat. 20% boost! But that's only for Win64, isn't it :(
-
@QuanTech (View Post)
Don't tell me you have 32 bit windows
If I made a 64 bit version I might consider dropping 32 bit support ... but not sure some people still use 32 bit windows for whatever reason. -
Oh nvm I do have win64 :P I switched to another older computer so I thought it'd be 32-bit
I'm such an idiot
Edited 2 times by QuanTech. Last: 2nd Jan 2017 -
Quick news: I tested the fps without Large Screen mode, and I got 95+ fps on that save I mentioned in the OP post.
TL;DR: Use small window on laggy saves.
-
Any news on the official 64 bit support?
