I need some opinions here

  • zc00gii
    17th Aug 2010 Banned 0 Permalink
    This post is hidden because the user is banned
  • zc00gii
    17th Aug 2010 Banned 0 Permalink
    This post is hidden because the user is banned
  • ssc4k
    17th Aug 2010 Member 0 Permalink
    I would be willing to do some viable work on the code if it was object oriented (I find that much less confusing :p) but if you're going to want a rewrite for OOP why not use c++?
  • zc00gii
    17th Aug 2010 Banned 0 Permalink
    This post is hidden because the user is banned
  • savask
    17th Aug 2010 Developer 0 Permalink
    [sarcasm] Lets rewrite it in Haskell! It supports lazy calculations, inf+ lists and have garbage collector too![/sarcasm]
    And mine opinion, that it's useless. OOP will reduce speed and why you should rewrite it? It was in pure C for 41.0 but why we need it OOC (never heard about it)? Even if you will say that we can rewrite it in C++, I may agree, but OOC...
  • zc00gii
    17th Aug 2010 Banned 0 Permalink
    This post is hidden because the user is banned
  • zc00gii
    17th Aug 2010 Banned 0 Permalink
    This post is hidden because the user is banned
  • Rob215
    17th Aug 2010 Member 0 Permalink
    What to download to make ooc code
  • ssc4k
    17th Aug 2010 Member 0 Permalink
    zc00gii:
    C++ is dusty, crappy, ugly, messy, horrible, heavy, dumb, retarded, slow, and altogether, a horrible language. That is why.
    Also, ooc is awesome.

    C++ is less dusty than the C99 standard ;). If it was crappy, ugly, messy, horrible, heavy, dumb, retarded, slow people wouldn't be developing in it so much lol. It's a nice balance of features, speed, and comparability. It has most (all?) of the features of the OOC language and is just as easy to port C to. It is widely supported by many free libraries and most people who program know it already as it is used as much as C.

    lots of languages are "awesome" :p
  • zc00gii
    17th Aug 2010 Banned 0 Permalink
    This post is hidden because the user is banned